![]() Will all the above occur within your selected time frame? Is it likely or possible your chosen software will allow the integration with the available and evolving environmental software apps.? Will the software you choose be able to exchange data and takeĪdvantage of this rapidly emerging environment? Now consider the rapid changes that are now evolving in software and its applications to the CLOUD useĪnd to BIM (Built Information Modelling). If you are a younger user of Chief Architect you may not. They may avoid the impact of the exponential change in 3D CAD software. Let's be generous and say they may be in practice for at least the next 5 - 10 years. Those active ChiefTalk participants currently using Chief Architect are I guess Now in reading the comments from current Chief Architect users remember to Beware! ![]() ![]() What will be the documentation requirements of these bodies?Ĭonsider your practice/firm phases in the next 5, 10, 15, etc years of your anticipated practice. LOCAL GOVERNMENT, STATE, OR FEDERAL project types Residential one off "unique design" (sloping walls etc)ĬONSULTANTS USED - exchange of informationįor your likely building types, what degree of exchange of documentation do youĪnticipate with your consultants? (Structural, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing etc) That should be considered by the potential user.ī. In the comparison of 3D CAD software, there are several core questions And although a lot of guys use multiple software platforms, I think Chief really can do just about all of it. Chief is a good program though and I personally think its probably the best software out there for average to mid range higher end residential. I think this is slowly dying though and unless you're already heavily invested in it or working for a company that requires it, I see no reason to start down that road.Ī lot of us use one or more of the above in addition to Chief to either supplement capabilities or for different projects. Kinda spendy for what you get but it still seems to be the standard for a lot of drafting shops. Also slower IMO when comparing completed 3D models and 2D output apples to apples.ĪutoCAD.Really a 2D CAD app even though there's a 3D version. Sketchup.cheaper, maybe slightly easier to use for some things, but requires a crapload of plugins and add-ons to do what Chief can do OOB. More powerful though if you are doing a lot of commercial or complex/highly "modern"/free form residential. Revit.more expensive for full version, way overkill and much slower for average residential projects. Been discussed ad nauseam but in a very small nutshell. To learn more about SketchUp’s professional offerings, see the attachment below.Yep. Access render-ready content from the Chaos Cosmos 3D library.Generate high-quality photorealistic visualizations in V-Ray 5.Precisely model on point clouds in SketchUp Pro.Import and view point cloud data from drones, terrestrial scans, photogrammetry, lidar sensors, and mobile mapping.In addition to the features listed above, Studio subscribers can: If you’re looking to integrate complex project stages-from site surveys to design, construction, and post-construction-Studio is a good fit. SketchUp Studio is the premier subscription package in the SketchUp suite, intended for advanced workflows. Hundreds of free and paid extensions to customize your modeling workflowĭifferences between SketchUp Pro and SketchUp Studio.Interoperability with dozens of CAD file formats.Unlimited cloud storage & collaboration.Millions of pre-built models ready for download.It includes the intuitive desktop modeler designers know and love, along with a suite of solutions to support a design-build lifecycle, or BIM process. Sustainability and Performance in Architectureĭesigned for AEC and interior design professionals, SketchUp Pro is the most popular subscription offering in the SketchUp portfolio. The Future of Architectural Visualization
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |